|
【参考文献】
⑴ 张汝伦。历史与实践[M]。上海：上海人民出版社，1995。
⑵ Edmund Husserl：The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Northwestern University Press,1970.
⑶ [德]哈贝马斯。后形而上学思想[M]。上海：译林出版社，2001年版。
⑷ Alfred Schutz：Alfred Schutz on Phenomenology and Social Relation, The University of Chicago Press,1970.
⑸ Habermas：The Theory of Communication Action,Vol.2,Polity Press,1989.
⑹ Habermas：On the Pragmatics of Communication, Cambridge Press,1998.
⑺ Habermas：The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Polity Press,1987.
⑻ 薛华。哈贝马斯的商谈伦理学[M]。沈阳：辽宁教育出版社，1988。
⑼ [英]廉姆·奥斯维特。哈贝马斯[M]。哈尔滨：黑龙江人们出版社，1999。
⑽ [德]哈贝马斯。交往与社会进化[M]。重庆：重庆出版社，1989。
⑾ Habermas：The Theory of Communication Action, Vol.1, Polity Press,1989.
⑿ 马克思恩格斯全集[M]。第3卷。北京：人民出版社，1960。
On Habermas' Significance of ”Lifeworld“
Liuyuedi （philophy department, Nankai Univrsity, Tianjin, 300071, China）
ABSTACT: Habermas' normative basic of the theory of communicative action is mutual interpretation between communicative action and lifeworld. There are three significance of lifeworld: the internal framework of lifeworld involves culture, society and personality, and it forms background of communicative action and reservoir of understanding one another. At the same time, lifeworld is provided with both internal framework's function and external function relating to the objective, the social, and the subjective world. But there are some problems to deliberate in universal pragmatics' basic, concrete content and idealization of lifeworld.
KEY WORDS: Habermas lifeworld communicative action intersubjectivity
[2][①] 这段话出自哈贝马斯的专著：Moral Consciousness and Communication Action，译文略有改动。
（文章来源：中国社会科学院哲学研究所）
继续浏览：1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
文章来源：北大美学网 2008-4-11
【本文责编：思玮】
|
