【首页】 中国民俗学会最新公告: ·UNESCO ‖ 今天,我们庆祝首个国际非物质文化遗产日   ·第三届民俗学、民间文学全国高校骨干教师高级研修班在内蒙古大学成功举办   ·第三届民俗学民间文学全国高校骨干教师高级研修班在内蒙古大学开班  
   研究论文
   专著题录
   田野报告
   访谈·笔谈·座谈
   学者评介
   书评文萃
   译著译文
   民俗影像
   平行学科
   民俗学刊物
《民俗研究》
《民族艺术》
《民间文化论坛》
《民族文学研究》
《文化遗产》
《中国民俗文摘》
《中原文化研究》
《艺术与民俗》
《遗产》
   民俗学论文要目索引
   研究综述

民俗影像

首页民俗学文库民俗影像

[张举文]迈向民俗学的影视与民俗研究
  作者:张举文 | 中国民俗学网   发布日期:2012-08-27 | 点击数:16704
 

  【参考文献】

  [1] Albers, Patricia C., and W. James. 1990. Private and Public Images: A Study of Photographic Contrasts in Postcard Pictures of Great Basin Indians, 1898-1919.ed.Joannna Cohan Scherer. Special Issue of Visual Anthropology-Picturing Culture: Historical Photographs in Anthropological Inquiry 3, no.2-3:343-66.

  [2] Asch, Timothy and Patsy Asch. 1988. Film in Anthropological Research. In Cinematographic Theory and New Dimensions in Ethnographic Film. Eds. Paul Hockings and Yasuhiro Omori. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology. Senri Ethnological Studies No. 24. pp.165-189.

  [3] Askew, Kelly, and Richard R. Wilk. 2002. The Anthropology of Media: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

  [4] Balikci, Asen. 1995. Reconstructing Cultures on Film. In Principles of Visual Anthropology, ed. Paul Hockings, 181-192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  [5] Banks, Marcus and Howard Morphy. 1997. Introduction: Rethinking Visual Anthropology. In Rethinking Visual Anthropology, eds. Marcus Banks and Howard Morphy, 1-35. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  [6] Banks, Marcus and Howard Morphy. eds.1997. Rethinking Visual Anthropology. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  [7] Barnes, Ruth, and Joanne B. Eicher. eds. 1992. Dress and Gender: Making and Meaning. Providence: Berg.

  [8] Bateson, Gregory and Margaret Mead. 1935-1942.Fieldnotes and Relevant Papers. Washington: Library of Congress.

  [9] Bateson, Gregory and Margaret Mead. 1942. Balinese Character: A Photographic Analysis. Vol.2.New York: New York Academy of Science.

  [10] Bateson, Gregory. 1943.Cultural and Thematic Analysis of Fictional Films. In Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. Ser.2, no.4, 72-78. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

  [11] Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.

  [12] Cellender, Charles and Fadwa El Guindi. 1971. Life-crisis Rituals among the Kenuz. Cleveland: The Press of the Case Western Reserve University.

  [13] Collier, John, Jr. and Malcolm Collier. 1986. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Rev. and exp. Ed. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

  [14] Crawford, Peter Ian and David Turton. eds. 1992. Film as Ethnography. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  [15] Crawford, Peter Ian. 2001. From Ethnographic Film to Visual Anthroplogy: Donning the Straightjacket of Academia. In Origins of Visual Anthropology: Putting the Past Together. Ed. Rolf Husmann.Gttingen:Institute für den Wissenschaftlichen Film-Knowledge and Media.

  [16] Dundes, Alan. 2005. Folkloristics in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of American Folklore 118(470):385-408.

  [17] Eicher, Joanne B. ed. 1995. Dress and Ethnicity: Change across Space and Time. Ethnic Identities. Oxford: Berg.

  [18] El Guindi, Fadwa. 1986. The Myth of Ritual: A Native“s Ethnography of Zapotec Life-Crisis Rituals. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

  [19] El Guindi, Fadwa. 2001. Beyond the Visible: Method and Theory in Visual Anthropology. In Visual Anthropology Becoming an Academic Discipline, ed. Rolf Husmann and Beate Engelbrecht. Gttingen: Institute für den Wissenschaftlichen Film-Knowledge and Media.

  [20] El Guindi, Fadwa. 2004. Visual Anthropology: Essential Method and Theory. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

  [21] Folklore 1934: 290.

  [22] Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.

  [23] Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public. New York: Basic Books.

  [24] Gross, Larry. ed. 1981. Studying Visual Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  [25] Heider, Karl G. 1976. Ethnographic Film. Austin: University of Texas Press.

  [26] Heider, Karl G. and Carol Hermer. 1995. Films for Anthropological Teaching. Special Publication of the American Anthropological Association: Professional Series, vol. 29.Arlington: American Anthropological Association.

  [27] Hockings, Paul and Yasuhiro Omori. eds. 1988. Cinematographic Theory and New Dimensions in Ethnographic Film. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.

  [28] Hockings, Paul.1988.”Ethnographic Filming and the Development of Anthropological Theory.“In Cinematographic Theory and New Dimensions in Ethnographic Film. Eds. Paul Hockings and Yasuhiro Omori. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology. Pp.205-224.

  [29] Hockings, Paul.ed. 1995. Principles of Visual Anthropology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  [30] Husmann, Rolf.ed.2001. Origins of Visual Anthropology: Putting the Past Together. Papers from Gottingen, Germany, June 21-25, 2001. Visual Anthropology Review.

  [31] Jacobson, David. 1999. Doing Research in Cyberspace. Field Methods 11(2):124-126.

  [32] Kendon, Adam. 1983. Gesture and Speech: How They Interact. In Nonverbal Interaction, ed. J. M. Wiemann and R. P. Harrison, 13-46. Beverly Hill: Sage.

  [33] Kendon, Adam. 1990. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  [34] Lomax, Alan. et al. eds. 1968. Folk Song Style and Culture. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

  [35] MacDougall, David. 1978. Ethnographic Film: Failure and Promise. Annual Review of Anthropology 7: 405-425.

  [36] MacDougall, David. 1997. The Visual in Anthropology. In Rethinking Visual Anthropology. Ed. Marcus Banks and Howard Morphy, 276-295. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  [37] Margaret, Mead. 1976. For God”s Sake. Co-Evolutionary Quarterly 10 (June): 32-44. (Also, for the conversation, available: www.oikos.org/forgod.htm)。

  [38] Mead, Margaret. 1995. Visual Anthropology in a Discipline of Words. In Principles of Visual Anthropology, 2[nd] ed., ed. Paul Hockings, 3-10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  [39] Miller, D. and D. Slater. 2002. Relationships. In The Anthropology of Media: A Reader. Ed. K. Askew and R. Wilk, 187-209. Oxford: Blackwell.

  [40] Morphy, Howard. 1994. The Interpretations of Ritual: Reflections from Film on Anthropological Methods. Manv 29 (1):117-146.

  [41] Morris Rosalind C. 1994. New Worlds from Fragments: Films, Ethnography, and the Representation of Northwest Coast Cultures. Boulder: Westview Press.

  [42] Nijiland, Dirk J. 2002. A History of Ethnographic Film, Video and Multimedia in the Netherlands. In Tales from Academia: History of Anthropology in the Netherlands, ed. Han Vermeulen and Jean Kommers, 893-935. Nijmegen Studies in Development and Cultural Change, vol. 40, pt.2.Saarbrucken: Verlag Fur Entwicklungspolitik.

  [43] Prins, Harald and John Bishop. 2001-2002. Edmund Carpenter: Explorations in Media and Anthropology. Visual Anthropology Review 17(2):110-140.

  [44] Roach-Higgins, M. E. and Joanne B. Eicher. 1992. Dress and Identity. Clothing and Textile Research Journal 10(4):1-8.

  [45] Ruby, Jay. 1975. Is an Ethnographic Film a Filmic Ethnography? Studies in Visual Communication 6 (2):104-111.

  [46] Ruby, Jay. 2000. Picturing Culture: Exploration of Film and Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  [47] Ruby, Jay. 2002. The Professionalization of Visual Anthropology in the United States: The 1960s and 1970s. Visual Anthropology Review 17(2):5-12.

  [48] Ruby, Jay. ed. 1993. The Cinema of John Marshall. Philadelphia: Harwood Academic.

  [49] Scheflen, Ablert E. 1973. Body Language and the Social Order: Communication as Behavioral Control. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

  [50] Sherman, Sharon. 1998. Documenting Ourselves: Film, Video and Culture. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.

  [51] Sherman, Sharon. 2005. Focusing In: Film and the Survival of Folklore Studies in the 21th Century. Western Folklor 63-4 (2004):291-318.

  [52] Turner, Terence. 1995. Representation, Collaboration and Mediation in Contemporary Ethnographic and Indigenous Media. Visual Anthropology Review 11(2):102-6.


继续浏览:1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |

  文章来源:中国民俗学网
【本文责编:CFNEditor】

上一条: ·[刘大先]何谓“文明”与“野蛮”:观《赛德克·巴莱》有感
下一条: ·[贺绎]民俗摄影随想
   相关链接
·[林继富]记录民俗学:民俗学研究范式创新的基础·晚清民国民俗手抄本现身 详细记录民俗节庆
·陶立璠:民俗学意义上的摄影价值及其判定·[马未都]《手艺中国》:细微之处是中华文化的精华
·[张举文]记录民俗是民俗学研究的前提(代译序)·[贺绎]民俗摄影随想

公告栏
在线投稿
民俗学论坛
民俗学博客
入会申请
RSS订阅

民俗学论坛民俗学博客
注册 帮助 咨询 登录

学会机构合作网站友情链接版权与免责申明网上民俗学会员中心学会会员 会费缴纳2024年会专区移动端本网导航旧版回顾
主办:中国民俗学会  China Folklore Society (CFS) Copyright © 2003-2024 All Rights Reserved 版权所有
地址:北京朝阳门外大街141号 邮编:100020
联系方式: 学会秘书处 办公时间:每周一或周二上午10:30—下午4:30   投稿邮箱   会员部   入会申请
京ICP备14046869号-1    京公网安备11010602201293       技术支持:中研网